This guide is for ACCT 635 Week 4 Individual Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography, start to submission. An outline of the research paper and an annotated bibliography for your company and its new standards.
ACCT 635 is Advanced Research for Financial Reporting, 3 credit hours, in Liberty University's MS in Accounting. Canvas and the course guide file print the code as ACCT635; it is the same course.
| Course | ACCT 635 Advanced Research for Financial Reporting |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 4 |
| Points | 50 points |
| Length | An outline and an annotated bibliography |
| Sources | At least the 5 references the paper will need, beyond the textbook and the Bible |
| Faith integration | Not required by the guide |
| Format | Current APA |
What ACCT 635 Week 4 Individual Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography asks for
The outline and annotated bibliography for the individual research project are due in Module/Week 4 with Wolk chapter 6. The project paper examines the impact of new U.S. accounting standards on a recent 10-K of the U.S. public company you selected. Worth 50 points.
Where it fits in ACCT 635
In the published schedule, Individual Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography is one of 9 graded written assignments in ACCT 635. It follows Week 4 Discussion Board Forum 4 and comes before Week 5 Discussion Board Forum 5. The same week also has Discussion Board Forum 4, so plan the week's writing together.
How ACCT 635 Week 4 Individual Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography is graded
Liberty grades Individual Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography with the rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas, worth 50 points in the published guide. That is about 5% of the course's 1,010 points. Open the rubric before you draft and read across each row: the top column describes what full credit looks like, and the gap between columns tells you what costs points.
Course grades in ACCT 635 use Liberty's point scale: an A is 940 to 1010 points of the course total. Missing the length or source minimum usually costs points on several rows at once, which is why the checklist below starts with them.
Timing in the published guide: Each course module/week begins on Monday morning at 12:00 a.m. (ET) and ends on Sunday night at 11:59 p.m. (ET). The final module/week ends at 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday. Check the due dates in your Canvas section, which govern.
The ACCT 635 Week 4 method, step by step
Define the scope of the search
Write down the question the review serves and the limits of the search: years, populations, study types. The scope tells the grader why these sources and not others.
Search systematically
Use the library databases with a fixed set of terms and filters, and collect more than the minimum (At least the 5 references the paper will need, beyond the textbook and the Bible).
Organize by theme, not by article
Sort the sources into themes before writing. Each paragraph should discuss a theme across several studies.
Compare and evaluate
Weigh the studies against each other: design, sample, consistency of findings.
Identify the gap
Name the gap the sources leave open and how it connects to your question.
Format the references carefully
Check every reference against APA, and every in-text citation against the list (An outline and an annotated bibliography).
Annotate the 10-K itself as a source, noting the pages of the adoption footnote and the transition adjustment, along with the FASB update and scholarly articles on the standard's effects.
A structure for ACCT 635 Week 4 Individual Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography
Word targets are planning numbers for about 1,000 words of body text, set by the length in the guide; the rubric decides where to spend more.
| Section | What it must do | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Company and standards | The company and the standards you will examine. | ~140 words |
| Outline | Sections and key points for 12 to 15 pages. | ~440 words |
| Annotated bibliography | Sources with annotations. | ~420 words |
A topic angle that works
Build the outline around the standards, one section per standard, each covering what changed, how the company adopted it and the effect on the statements, so the paper follows directly.
Model paragraph with notes
An original paragraph written by our desk to show the register that earns full rubric credit. It is study material: learn the moves, then write your own.
III. ASC 842, Leases. A. The standard requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for most leases.1 B. The company adopted it using the modified retrospective method and recognized $1.8 billion of lease liabilities on adoption (10-K, Note 7). C. Effects: total liabilities rose 12%, while operating income was little changed.2
- One section per standard.
- Company-specific figures.
- Sources placed.
Mistakes that cost points on ACCT 635 Week 4
- No company figures.
- Too few sources.
- An outline of topics only.
Checklist before you submit
- Length: An outline and an annotated bibliography
- Sources: At least the 5 references the paper will need, beyond the textbook and the Bible
- Sources organized by theme, not one per paragraph
- The gap is stated and tied to the question
- Each rubric row read against the section that answers it
Questions students ask
When is the ACCT 635 outline due?
In Module/Week 4.
How many points is ACCT 635 Week 4 Individual Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography worth?
50 points in Liberty's published course guide for ACCT 635, out of a course total of 1,010 points (about 5% of the grade). The rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas shows how those points are divided.
Is ACCT 635 Week 4 the same in every section of ACCT 635?
This guide follows Liberty's published course guide for ACCT 635. Liberty notes that course content can change from term to term, so if your Canvas section shows different instructions, a different week or different points, follow Canvas and your instructor.
Want a tutor to look at your draft?
Send the instructions and what you have so far. A Liberty tutor replies with what to fix first, usually within the hour.