This guide is for HLTH 349 Week 6 Article Review 3, start to submission. The third 450 to 500-word article review.
HLTH 349 is Policy and Public Health, 3 credit hours, in Liberty University's BS in Public Health. Canvas and the course guide file print the code as HLTH349; it is the same course.
| Course | HLTH 349 Policy and Public Health |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 6 |
| Points | 80 points |
| Length | 450 to 500 words |
| Sources | The assigned article |
| Faith integration | Not required by the guide |
| Format | Current APA |
What HLTH 349 Week 6 Article Review 3 asks for
Review 3 is due in Module/Week 6 with McKenzie et al. chapter 14, the same week as Quiz 2. Same requirements as the earlier reviews. Worth 80 points.
Where it fits in HLTH 349
In the published schedule, Article Review 3 is one of 7 graded written assignments in HLTH 349. It follows Week 5 Discussion Board Forum 3 and comes before Week 7 Article Review 4.
How HLTH 349 Week 6 Article Review 3 is graded
Liberty grades Article Review 3 with the rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas, worth 80 points in the published guide. That is about 8% of the course's 1,010 points. Read the rubric first. Each row is a criterion, and the wording of the highest column is the closest thing you have to a model answer.
Course grades in HLTH 349 use Liberty's point scale: an A is 900 to 1010 points of the course total. Missing the length or source minimum usually costs points on several rows at once, which is why the checklist below starts with them.
Timing in the published guide: Each course module/week (except Module/Week 1) begins on Tuesday morning at 12:00 a.m. (ET) and ends on Monday night at 11:59 p.m. (ET). The final module/week ends at 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday. Check the due dates in your Canvas section, which govern.
The HLTH 349 Week 6 method, step by step
Read the article twice, differently
Read the article once for what it says and once for how it was done. On the second pass, note the design, sample, measures, analysis and any limitation the authors admit.
Describe before you judge
Open with an accurate, brief description of the study: purpose, question or hypothesis, design, sample and main findings. The critique only works if the reader trusts your summary.
Appraise each part of the study
Work through the study section by section and ask the questions the course uses: is the design suited to the question, is the sample adequate, are the measures valid, do the results support the conclusions?
Name strengths as well as weaknesses
Balance the appraisal. Strengths that are explained carry as much weight with graders as weaknesses, and a one-sided critique reads as careless.
Say what it means for practice
Close with usefulness: could the findings change practice, for which patients or settings, and with what caution?
Keep to the length and format
Write in paragraphs, inside 450 to 500 words, with current APA citations. A critique that turns into a table or list usually loses its argument.
A structure for HLTH 349 Week 6 Article Review 3
Word targets are planning numbers for about 900 words of body text, set by the length in the guide; the rubric decides where to spend more.
| Section | What it must do | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Citation and purpose | The article and its aim. | ~140 words |
| Summary | Main points and evidence. | ~400 words |
| The problem addressed | Its policy importance. | ~220 words |
| Brief assessment | Strength or limitation. | ~140 words |
A topic angle that works
Close with one sentence judging the article's evidence: is it a single-site study, a national dataset or an opinion piece? That judgment is what separates a review from a summary.
Model paragraph with notes
An original paragraph written by our desk to show the register that earns full rubric credit. It is study material: learn the moves, then write your own.
The article's strength is its national dataset, which makes its findings on uninsured rates believable across states. Its limitation is that it covers only the first two years after the policy, before longer-term effects on health outcomes could appear, so its conclusions about health should be read as early evidence.1
- Names a strength.
- Names a limitation.
- A fair conclusion.
Mistakes that cost points on HLTH 349 Week 6
- No assessment.
- Over 500 words.
- Missing citation.
Checklist before you submit
- Length: 450 to 500 words
- Sources: The assigned article
- The summary of the study is accurate and brief
- Strengths and weaknesses are both explained
- Each rubric row read against the section that answers it
Questions students ask
When is HLTH 349 Article Review 3 due?
In Module/Week 6.
How many points is HLTH 349 Week 6 Article Review 3 worth?
80 points in Liberty's published course guide for HLTH 349, out of a course total of 1,010 points (about 8% of the grade). The rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas shows how those points are divided.
Is HLTH 349 Week 6 the same in every section of HLTH 349?
This guide follows Liberty's published course guide for HLTH 349. Liberty notes that course content can change from term to term, so if your Canvas section shows different instructions, a different week or different points, follow Canvas and your instructor.
Want a tutor to look at your draft?
Send the instructions and what you have so far. A Liberty tutor replies with what to fix first, usually within the hour.