This guide is for NURS 500 Week 3 Research Proposal Part 1, start to submission. Part 1 of the four-part NURS 500 research proposal: Background, Significance, and Research Questions, worth 100 points.
NURS 500 is Research, 3 credit hours, in Liberty University's MSN. Canvas and the course guide file print the code as NURS500; it is the same course.
| Course | NURS 500 Research |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 3 |
| Points | 100 points |
| Length | Part 1 of a 9 to 16-page proposal (about 2 to 4 pages for this part) |
| Sources | 10 to 15 references across the whole proposal; most of Part 1's come from recent literature on the problem |
| Faith integration | Not required by the guide |
| Format | Current APA throughout |
What NURS 500 Week 3 Research Proposal Part 1 asks for
The guide breaks the research proposal into four parts and names this one Background, Significance, and Research Questions, due in Module/Week 3. You introduce a clinical problem, show why it matters to nursing, and state the research questions a primary study would answer.
Everything later in the course is built on this part. The literature review in Week 4 searches around your question, the methods in Week 5 have to fit it, and the measures in Week 6 have to capture its variables. The guide sets the complete proposal at 9 to 16 pages with proper APA formatting and 10 to 15 cumulative references.
Where it fits in NURS 500
In the published schedule, Research Proposal Part 1 is one of 7 graded written assignments in NURS 500. It follows Week 1 Discussion Board Forum 1 and comes before Week 4 Research Proposal Part 2.
How NURS 500 Week 3 Research Proposal Part 1 is graded
Liberty grades Research Proposal Part 1 with the rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas, worth 100 points in the published guide. That is about 10% of the course's 1,010 points. Open the rubric before you draft and read across each row: the top column describes what full credit looks like, and the gap between columns tells you what costs points.
Course grades in NURS 500 use Liberty's point scale: an A is 940 to 1010 points of the course total. Missing the length or source minimum usually costs points on several rows at once, which is why the checklist below starts with them.
Timing in the published guide: Each course module/week begins on Monday morning at 12:00 a.m. (ET) and ends on Sunday night at 11:59 p.m. (ET). The final module/week ends at 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday. Check the due dates in your Canvas section, which govern.
The NURS 500 Week 3 method, step by step
Read this part against the whole
Before drafting Research Proposal Part 1, read ahead to the later parts. Each part builds on the last, and a decision that looks fine now can box you in two weeks later.
Lock the topic and the question early
Commit to one problem and one answerable question. In NURS 500, the parts that follow depend on that question, so time spent sharpening it here is saved later.
Write to the headings the part names
Use the headings in the part's instructions as your section headings, in the same order. Graders check for each element, and a missing heading is the easiest way to lose points.
Support every claim with current evidence
Keep the evidence current and relevant (10 to 15 references across the whole proposal; most of Part 1's come from recent literature on the problem). Each source should support a specific statement in this part, and the set should show why the problem is worth studying.
Keep the draft consistent with earlier parts
Read the feedback on the previous part first and carry the corrections forward. Consistent wording across parts is what makes the final document read as one proposal.
Check length and APA before submitting
Check the part against its share of the total length (Part 1 of a 9 to 16-page proposal, about 2 to 4 pages for this part) and apply current APA throughout. A part that runs far over its share usually contains material that belongs in a later section.
A structure for NURS 500 Week 3 Research Proposal Part 1
Word targets are planning numbers for about 850 words of body text, set by the length in the guide; the rubric decides where to spend more.
| Section | What it must do | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Background | Describe the clinical problem, who it affects and the current state of practice, with data. | ~300 words |
| Significance | Show why it matters to patients, nursing and the organization: outcomes, cost, safety. | ~260 words |
| Purpose | State in one or two sentences what the study would do. | ~90 words |
| Research questions | Two or three answerable questions that name the population and variables. | ~210 words |
A topic angle that works
Choose a problem where the gap is in knowledge, not just compliance. "Do nurses follow the fall-prevention bundle?" is an audit; "Is bundle adherence on night shift associated with staffing ratio on medical-surgical units?" is a research question. The second gives you variables to define in Part 3 and measure in Part 4.
Model paragraph with notes
An original paragraph written by our desk to show the register that earns full rubric credit. It is study material: learn the moves, then write your own.
Falls remain one of the most frequent adverse events reported by adult medical-surgical units, and each fall with injury lengthens the stay and adds cost the hospital cannot bill.1 The problem is sharper at night, when staffing is thinner and patients wake disoriented, yet most published fall studies report day and night outcomes together.2 A study that separates the night shift would tell nurse managers whether their staffing decisions, not only their bundle, are part of the problem; that is the question this proposal addresses.3
- States the scale of the problem and its consequences in the first sentence; significance is about outcomes, not interest.
- Names the gap in the literature precisely, which sets up both the research question and the Week 4 review.
- Ends by tying the gap to a decision a nurse leader makes, so the significance is practical, not abstract.
Mistakes that cost points on NURS 500 Week 3
- A topic too broad to study. "improving patient safety" cannot produce answerable questions; a unit, a population and a measurable outcome can.
- Questions that are really yes-or-no practice audits. Research questions ask about relationships, differences or experiences, not whether a policy exists.
- Background without numbers. Incidence, rates or costs from recent sources make the problem real; adjectives do not.
- Forgetting that this part is the foundation. A question you cannot measure in Week 6 will cost points twice.
Checklist before you submit
- Length: Part 1 of a 9 to 16-page proposal (about 2 to 4 pages for this part)
- Sources: 10 to 15 references across the whole proposal; most of Part 1's come from recent literature on the problem
- Matches the topic and question used in the earlier parts
- Instructor feedback on the previous part applied
- Each rubric row read against the section that answers it
Questions students ask
How long is NURS 500 Research Proposal Part 1?
The guide gives only the length of the whole proposal, 9 to 16 pages. Split across four parts, Part 1 usually runs about 2 to 4 pages before the title and reference pages.
How many research questions should Part 1 have?
The guide does not set a number. Two or three focused questions are typical, each naming the population and the variables, so Parts 3 and 4 can design and measure them.
How many points is NURS 500 Week 3 Research Proposal Part 1 worth?
100 points in Liberty's published course guide for NURS 500, out of a course total of 1,010 points (about 10% of the grade). The rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas shows how those points are divided.
Is NURS 500 Week 3 the same in every section of NURS 500?
This guide follows Liberty's published course guide for NURS 500. Liberty notes that course content can change from term to term, so if your Canvas section shows different instructions, a different week or different points, follow Canvas and your instructor.
Want a tutor to look at your draft?
Send the instructions and what you have so far. A Liberty tutor replies with what to fix first, usually within the hour.