This guide is for NURS 716 Week 6 Assignment 4 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Part 1, start to submission. Part 1 of a mock evidence-based practice proposal, building on your PICO question and literature review, formatted to the DNP Handbook's scholarly project guidelines.
NURS 716 is Applications of Evidence-Based Care, 3 credit hours, in Liberty University's DNP. Canvas and the course guide file print the code as NURS716; it is the same course.
| Course | NURS 716 Applications of Evidence-Based Care |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 6 |
| Points | 125 points |
| Length | Not set in the guide; follow the DNP Handbook's proposal sections |
| Sources | The 10 articles from Assignment 2 and further scholarly sources |
| Faith integration | Not required by the guide |
| Format | DNP Handbook scholarly project guidelines; current APA |
What NURS 716 Week 6 Assignment 4 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Part 1 asks for
You develop Part 1 of a mock evidence-based practice proposal. The project builds on the PICO question and literature review started in Assignments 1 and 2, based on the scenario provided. The DNP Handbook Scholarly Project Guidelines serve as the guide to format the proposal. It is due in Module/Week 6 with Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt chapter 9 and a review of the DNP Handbook's scholarly project section. Worth 125 points.
Where it fits in NURS 716
In the published schedule, Assignment 4 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Part 1 is one of 9 graded written assignments in NURS 716. It follows Week 5 Discussion Board Forum 3 and comes before Week 7 Discussion Board Forum 4.
How NURS 716 Week 6 Assignment 4 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Part 1 is graded
Liberty grades Assignment 4 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Part 1 with the rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas, worth 125 points in the published guide. That is about 12% of the course's 1,010 points. Open the rubric before you draft and read across each row: the top column describes what full credit looks like, and the gap between columns tells you what costs points.
Course grades in NURS 716 use Liberty's point scale: an A is 940 to 1010 points of the course total. Missing the length or source minimum usually costs points on several rows at once, which is why the checklist below starts with them.
Timing in the published guide: Each course module/week begins on Monday morning at 12:00 a.m. (ET) and ends on Sunday night at 11:59 p.m. (ET). The final module/week ends at 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday. Check the due dates in your Canvas section, which govern.
The NURS 716 Week 6 method, step by step
Read this part against the whole
Before drafting Assignment 4 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Part 1, read ahead to the later parts. Each part builds on the last, and a decision that looks fine now can box you in two weeks later.
Lock the topic and the question early
Commit to one problem and one answerable question. In NURS 716, the parts that follow depend on that question, so time spent sharpening it here is saved later.
Write to the headings the part names
Use the headings in the part's instructions as your section headings, in the same order. Graders check for each element, and a missing heading is the easiest way to lose points.
Support every claim with current evidence
Keep the evidence current and relevant (The 10 articles from Assignment 2 and further scholarly sources). Each source should support a specific statement in this part, and the set should show why the problem is worth studying.
Keep the draft consistent with earlier parts
Reuse the same terms, population and question you used before, and fix anything your instructor flagged in feedback on the previous part. Graders notice when a proposal changes its question halfway through.
Check length and APA before submitting
Check the part against its share of the total length (Not set in the guide; follow the DNP Handbook's proposal sections) and apply current APA throughout. A part that runs far over its share usually contains material that belongs in a later section.
A structure for NURS 716 Week 6 Assignment 4 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Part 1
Word targets are planning numbers for about 1,500 words of body text, set by the length in the guide; the rubric decides where to spend more.
| Section | What it must do | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Problem statement | The clinical problem and its significance. | ~270 words |
| Purpose and PICO question | The project's aim. | ~210 words |
| Theoretical and EBP framework | The Iowa Model and any theory. | ~270 words |
| Review of the literature | The synthesized evidence from Assignment 2. | ~540 words |
| Summary | How the evidence supports the intervention. | ~210 words |
A topic angle that works
Part 1 usually covers the opening sections of the handbook's proposal outline (problem, purpose, framework and literature). Rewrite the Assignment 2 table into a narrative review organized by theme rather than pasting it.
Model paragraph with notes
An original paragraph written by our desk to show the register that earns full rubric credit. It is study material: learn the moves, then write your own.
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections account for a large share of hospital-acquired infections and extend length of stay, and the scenario's unit has seen its CAUTI rate rise for two consecutive quarters.1 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services do not reimburse the additional cost of hospital-acquired CAUTI, so the problem is financial as well as clinical.2 The literature identifies prolonged catheter duration as the main modifiable risk factor, which makes catheter removal timing the logical target for an evidence-based practice change.3
- Establishes significance with data.
- Adds the financial stake.
- Points to the modifiable factor.
Mistakes that cost points on NURS 716 Week 6
- Pasting the synthesis table as the literature review.
- Ignoring the DNP Handbook format.
- A purpose that drifts from the PICO question.
Checklist before you submit
- Length: Not set in the guide; follow the DNP Handbook's proposal sections
- Sources: The 10 articles from Assignment 2 and further scholarly sources
- Matches the topic and question used in the earlier parts
- Instructor feedback on the previous part applied
- Each rubric row read against the section that answers it
Questions students ask
What format does the NURS 716 proposal follow?
The DNP Handbook Scholarly Project Guidelines.
How many points is NURS 716 Week 6 Assignment 4 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Part 1 worth?
125 points in Liberty's published course guide for NURS 716, out of a course total of 1,010 points (about 12% of the grade). The rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas shows how those points are divided.
Is NURS 716 Week 6 the same in every section of NURS 716?
This guide follows Liberty's published course guide for NURS 716. Liberty notes that course content can change from term to term, so if your Canvas section shows different instructions, a different week or different points, follow Canvas and your instructor.
Want a tutor to look at your draft?
Send the instructions and what you have so far. A Liberty tutor replies with what to fix first, usually within the hour.