This guide is for NURS 765 Week 7 Group Project Part 3, start to submission. A 7 to 10-page projected program evaluation of the group's curriculum, with 5 to 7 resources.
NURS 765 is Curriculum Development and Program Evaluation for Nurse Educators, 3 credit hours, in Liberty University's PhD in Nursing. Canvas and the course guide file print the code as NURS765; it is the same course.
| Course | NURS 765 Curriculum Development and Program Evaluation for Nurse Educators |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 7 |
| Points | 200 points |
| Length | 7 to 10 pages |
| Sources | 5 to 7 resources, which may include the textbook and the Bible |
| Faith integration | Not required by the guide |
| Format | Current APA paper; group assignment |
What NURS 765 Week 7 Group Project Part 3 asks for
In Part 3 you complete a projected program evaluation of the nursing curriculum, in a 7 to 10-page paper in current APA with 5 to 7 resources, which may include the textbook and the Bible. It is due in Module/Week 7 with Keating chapters 16 and 17. At 200 points it is the largest single assignment in the course.
Where it fits in NURS 765
In the published schedule, Group Project Part 3 is one of 8 graded written assignments in NURS 765. It follows Week 6 Group Project Part 2 and comes before Week 8 Discussion Board Forum 3.
How NURS 765 Week 7 Group Project Part 3 is graded
Liberty grades Group Project Part 3 with the rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas, worth 200 points in the published guide. That is about 20% of the course's 1,010 points. Open the rubric before you draft and read across each row: the top column describes what full credit looks like, and the gap between columns tells you what costs points.
Course grades in NURS 765 use Liberty's point scale: an A is 940 to 1010 points of the course total. Missing the length or source minimum usually costs points on several rows at once, which is why the checklist below starts with them.
Timing in the published guide: Each course module/week begins on Monday morning at 12:00 a.m. (ET) and ends on Sunday night at 11:59 p.m. (ET). The final module/week ends at 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday. Check the due dates in your Canvas section, which govern.
The NURS 765 Week 7 method, step by step
Start from the need
Define the need the Group Project Part 3 answers: who it is for, what gap exists, and how you know. A plan without an assessed need has nothing to measure against.
Write measurable objectives
Turn the need into objectives that can be measured: who, what, how much, by when. Vague goals make the evaluation section impossible to write.
Choose methods that fit the objectives
Select the strategies, content or interventions that fit each objective, and say why they fit, citing evidence (5 to 7 resources, which may include the textbook and the Bible).
Plan the resources and timeline
List what the plan needs (people, time, materials, cost) and the order of steps. Graders look for plans that could be carried out.
Plan the evaluation
Tie each objective to a measure and a time point. Evaluation is where most plans are thinnest.
Format and length
Use the template or headings the guide gives and stay within 7 to 10 pages, in current APA.
A structure for NURS 765 Week 7 Group Project Part 3
Word targets are planning numbers for about 1,800 words of body text, set by the length in the guide; the rubric decides where to spend more.
| Section | What it must do | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Purpose of the evaluation. | ~180 words |
| Evaluation model | The model used and why. | ~320 words |
| Outcomes and measures | Each program outcome, its measure and benchmark. | ~580 words |
| Data collection and timeline | Sources, who collects them and when. | ~360 words |
| Use of results and conclusion | How findings feed curriculum revision. | ~360 words |
A topic angle that works
Use a named evaluation model (the CIPP model or the accreditor's own standards) and give every program outcome a measure, a benchmark and a review cycle in one table, which is how a systematic plan for evaluation is usually presented.
Model paragraph with notes
An original paragraph written by our desk to show the register that earns full rubric credit. It is study material: learn the moves, then write your own.
Each program outcome has a measure and a benchmark. For the outcome on evidence translation, the measure is the DNP project final evaluation rubric, and the benchmark is that 90% of graduates score at or above "meets expectations" on the translation criterion.1 For employment, the measure is a graduate survey at six months, with a benchmark of 85% employed in an advanced role.2 Results are reviewed each spring by the curriculum committee, closing the loop Keating describes between evaluation and revision.3
- Measure and benchmark for each outcome.
- Uses multiple data sources.
- Feeds results back into revision.
Mistakes that cost points on NURS 765 Week 7
- Outcomes without benchmarks.
- No timeline.
- An evaluation unconnected to Parts 1 and 2.
Checklist before you submit
- Length: 7 to 10 pages
- Sources: 5 to 7 resources, which may include the textbook and the Bible
- Each objective is measurable and has an evaluation measure
- Required template or headings used
- Each rubric row read against the section that answers it
Questions students ask
How many points is NURS 765 Group Project Part 3?
200 points, the largest single assignment in the course.
How many points is NURS 765 Week 7 Group Project Part 3 worth?
200 points in Liberty's published course guide for NURS 765, out of a course total of 1,010 points (about 20% of the grade). The rubric attached to the assignment in Canvas shows how those points are divided.
Is NURS 765 Week 7 the same in every section of NURS 765?
This guide follows Liberty's published course guide for NURS 765. Liberty notes that course content can change from term to term, so if your Canvas section shows different instructions, a different week or different points, follow Canvas and your instructor.
Want a tutor to look at your draft?
Send the instructions and what you have so far. A Liberty tutor replies with what to fix first, usually within the hour.